

- #No output cakewalk home studio 2002 pro#
- #No output cakewalk home studio 2002 software#
- #No output cakewalk home studio 2002 code#
I agree or hear the Digi guys saying "Go buy them", my answer sure I would have, if I had known this or DIGI had documented it clearly saying warning all ports will be locked when using ProTools LE.
#No output cakewalk home studio 2002 software#
Getting a superior recording quality is appreciated however I cannot compromise my easiness to work when all other software in the world does things the better way.
#No output cakewalk home studio 2002 code#
I think it is high time for the code developers in Digi labs to start thinking about simple user interface. Why pay for a hardware which is does not work with other audio programs or atleast live along with other other programs. Frankly Cake walk would do this perfectly. The only solution I had was I have Korg d1600, I record one by one into Korg d16 then exported them to Protools as wav files. I have 8x8 ports – now you can see my night mare, entire track become messed up.

It does not occupy or go near the unselected ports. All the tracks contains port #1 as default, no clue why it takes #1.Ĭakewalk has a superior idea of selecting the port(s) to use for sequencing. No way! Protools imported it but the port numbers were changed. I tried to convert my sequence to dot mid files so that I can import into Protools.but! Not willing to give up (My investment (sometimes called as donation) is $1000 for Protools, $250 for cakewalk, $250 for midi man, $2700 for DELL and tons of sounds modules) I need them I use it or not I don’t care. It does not care!…bottom line, If you want to me to start just shut down all other programs that are using the midi ports. Protools grabs/chews them (8x8) mercilessly without my permission. No where in the world I told ProTools to use all my midi ports. Sounds simple isn’t it? However! "Protools LE " does not start, it complains with a message saying midi ports are taken up by some other software (you guessed it - Mr.Cakewalk). I want to retain cakewalk as my sequencer and sync them both using MTC. I wanted to record audio tracks into Protools. after composing a huge sequence with 20 layers of midi, Now, I have midi 8x8 midi interface., It works perfectly fine with cakewalk. I have a p4 1.7ghz pc that has ram to hold 10 foot ball fields.

I would bet my fortune on this, cakewalk’s midi implementation is by far superior than Protools. How did I come to this conclusion? Read below.
#No output cakewalk home studio 2002 pro#
The moral of my story The midi implementation of Pro tools LE simply "sucks".
